Workers' compensation premium rates in North Carolina are in line with those in southeastern states, but the state has slipped in
rankings since 2006, when it had among the lowest rates in the country.
According to the widely reported 2014 Oregon Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking Summary, 25 jurisdictions out of
51 in the country had higher workers' compensation premium rates than North Carolina as of January 2014. In 2006, 35 jurisdictions
had higher rates.
As of January 2014, Louisiana and South Carolina have the highest premium rates in the southeast at $2.23 and $2.00 per $100 of
payroll. Rates in North Carolina and other states in the region are between $1.50 -$1.99.
Oregon's Department of Consumer and Business Services conducts the study every two years.
The department says its study is based on measures that put states' workers' compensation
rates on a comparable basis, using a constant set of risk classifications for each state. The
study used classification codes from the National Council on Compensation Insurance.
The 2014 median value is $1.85, which is a drop of 2 percent from the $1.88 median of the
2012 study. National premium rate indices range from a low of $0.88 in North Dakota to a
high of $3.48 in California. Other states with the highest rates are, respectively, Connecticut,
New Jersey, New York, and Alaska. At the other end, Indiana, Arkansas, Virginia, and
Massachusetts boast the lowest rates in the country.
Officials in states which rank poorly are among those who say the biennial study doesn't
really say much about a state's workers' compensation system. For instance, states with more
generous benefits for injured workers would likely not do well in the study. Mike Manley, research coordinator at the Oregon agency,
agrees the study doesn't express the cost-effectiveness of a system.
California had a stiffer reaction. "There is nothing in the Oregon study to compare the differential coverage and benefits and
medical-legal appeals system that each state offers," Christine Baker, director of the California
Department of Industrial Relations, told the publication. "At the extreme, a state could
drastically reduce its scope and level of benefits in order to reduce costs and do "better' in the
Oregon comparison," she added.
Oregon officials also caution against making too much of the study. For one, the latest rankings
show 21 states within 10% of the median, and the range from highest and lowest rankings has
been shrinking. Some states may have enacted reforms that have yet to show results.
"We're always trying to tell other states ... that we're describing you, we're not evaluating you.
We're not saying you're doing well (or) you're doing poorly. It's a description of one aspect of
your system," Mr. Manley noted to Business Insurance.